Second judicial breakthrough in the prosecutor’s omerta “The Eight Dwarfs”

Sofia City Court (SCC) issued a second ruling against the thieving fellowship of the “Eight Dwarfs”. On January 25, the SCC Respect the claims brought by Iliya Zlatanov against the Boxer-on-Lyubena, formally known as Christian Hristov. Hristov is precisely the straw face to whom Lyubena is trying to transfer the ownership of the elevator factories to the Zlatanovi family. It is this “transfer” that attacked Zlatanov, and the decision is now key, although there are still pending cases between the parties.

Zlatanovi vs Lyubena – 2:0

Iliya Zlatanov essentially managed to “knock down” at first instance the decisions for the transfer of shares from March 2020, signed by him in a Government Hospital under severe coercion – after Lyubena threatened him that if he did not sign, his son would not receive life-saving hemodialysis – in other words, he would be killed. This is confirmed by testimony given in the case by an employee of Zlatanov. And again we see the “witnesses” of the other side (i.e. of Christian/Lyubena) – namely the famous notary Vesela Ivcheva and Atty. Desislava Kotseva – who claim that everything was accurate, legitimate, and in general – roses and honey. Kotseva denies before the court that she had threatened Yavor Zlatanov – but she has her own hass and not to deny. He himself recreated in front of the Anti-Corruption Fund the words that “we are actually more comfortable to die, And your baby will grow up without a father.“. A commercial judge, however, is not an investigative body and there is no way (and it is not his job) to establish whether or not there is a threat. This is actually a job of The geshftour, which, however, blissfully slumbers and shakes… feet (but that’s why you read below).

In the end, the court ruled in favor of Zlatanov on a purely technical basis – there is no way for Christian and company to delete Yavor Zlatanov as a manager in 2020, as far as this happened in 2017 – and was confirmed by an enforceable court decision. Ie. Lyubena’s legal illiteracy (not to mention the Boxer) cost them a “professional loss” of the match. Or at least at this half. If they had looked at the Commercial Register first, we would add. But where are you – how much better is it to buzz around Sofia in the company of special prosecutors, stockpiled a gun on the cross. So for that matter.

We would like to remind you that Lyubena Petrova still distraints on the companies from the Izamet Group to this day., Pardon Pavlova, as well as from the Specialized Prosecutor’s Office. Here it would be appropriate to ask on what very basis the SP’s liens persist in the legal peace after the SP itself was closed?! If these distraints should still exist, they should be renewed by the successor in title of the JV, i.e. by the Sofia City Prosecutor’s Office. However, there is no evidence that this has been done, and the DLR in the Registry Agency is obviously heedless. But anyway, more importantly, the distraints imposed by Lyubena herself are questionable. And this is so, as far as she Lost The key case for a promissory note for BGN 3 million, on which the distraints are based. I.e. this record was the “fee” for the “services” of the famous Euro – which, however, was already declared null and void and simulated by another SCC as early as September 2022, as we told you

then. If the above instances confirm, it will automatically follow that Lyubena’s distraints must fall. We will follow up and inform you as always, dear readers.

And again Delta Guard

Meanwhile, at the very end of last year, something quite interesting happened.

the Supreme Court of Cassation. Already two instances in Delta City had won a case against Izamet 1991 over a contract for “security” for the period February – October 2020, i.e. just when Lyubena and the Euro are trying Take over the elevator business.. The guards claim to be contracted but not paid over BGN 100,000 with VAT. And what a miracle – since both the SCC and the SAS ruled in favor of Delta, on 22.12.2022, days before the SCC to sit on the case, Delta makes refusal-from-claim. You see! Refusal means that they lose forever the right to reclaim. Such procedural behavior is rare and difficult to explain, especially against the backdrop of the statement of atty. Greta Ganeva some time ago that “If they lose this case, they will lose their license.“. We can only guess what lies behind the scenes of this refusal – but one possible hypothesis is a certain development, in a certain direction, of the pre-trial proceedings in the “Eight Dwarfs” case. Maybe.

Prosecutors are in no hurry.

As mentioned above, from 2020 the government leads pre-trial proceedings in the case “The Eight Dwarfs”. The Prosecutor’s Office
Trinity
Betsova, Petrov and Pophristova They have already conducted a number of interrogations (according to our information) and have collected a lot of data and evidence. Mysteriously, however, they failed (or did not want) to find the video from the cameras in the parking lot of the SP, which shows exactly how Frantisek and the prosecutor on duty load 30 kg of gold into Lyubena’s jeep. In this way, František remains invulnerable, or so it seems. This little (in fact, very much!) reminds of the “distractibility” of the prosecution, which for a long time pretended not to know about the recording from “behind the columns” and the ugly police beatings that took place there. Only after the whole of Bulgaria saw the recording, Prosecutor Ivanov from the SRS deigned to announce that he was attracting (only) four of the bullies as defendants. And a long time ago, after they were already fired from the Ministry of Interior. Obviously, something like this has to happen here, otherwise there will be no development. Put bluntly — The Prosecutor’s Office acts only under the pressure of scandal and public pressure. Otherwise, she prefers not to act – and she doesn’t have to, her salary goes. And it’s not small at all. And no one can hold you to account for why you don’t work. Goth!!

VAS plus SJC wash best

And when we said František, we cannot fail to praise the Supreme Administrative Court (the Court of Miracles).). At the end of 2021, Minister Demerdzhiev prepared a note on Frantisek’s role in this filthy corrupt miasma, in particular, his oral order for notary Ivcheva to “visit” Yavor Zlatanov in the hospital while picking his soul. On the basis of this note, the Minister of Justice submitted a request to the SJC for imposing disciplinary punishment on František. We will hardly surprise anyone by saying that in a very quick order, in March 2020 the SJC PK(P) refuses to punish him. A court appeal by Minister Yordanova follows – but again without surprises. July and November respectively
three-member
and
five-member
Compositions of the Supreme Administrative Court pronounce that František is innocent and just shines with purity. A rapporteur in the tri-member is a seconded judge, while in the five-member state – personally the legal leader of the People’s Militia, the former head of the Supreme Administrative Court Georgi Kolev, about whom we irrigatively told

you on the occasion of Yaneva Gate.

Without bothering you in detail with the motives of the judges, we will only focus on a few key points. Apparently, the SJC’s PK(P) had “talks” with both Frantisek and Angel Kanev – who was the supervising prosecutor and the “host of the show” at the hospital. According to the police officers, it was Kanev who “solved” everything that happened that day in the hospital – after he himself received permission from above from František. However, as far as this happened over the phone, there are no written traces. Convenient, isn’t it?! This is exactly what the stumbling block is: before the SJC Both Kanev and Frantisek deny that they have spoken at all on this day, and even less about hospitals, notaries, etc. And since the SJC is not an investigative body, they (probably) cannot request printouts from a phone, Viber, etc. (
Do you remember Mitko Vibar and Yaneva Gate??
), so as to catch the two mighty men in a lie. And whether and to what extent proc. Kanev demonstrates conscientious procedural behavior – well, here we no longer need to guess, because we have black and white. By protocol order in Case 6868/2020 of the ACSC, proc. Kanev was fined BGN 500 for contempt of court and failure to appear as a subpoenaed witness. The ruling has not been appealed and has entered into force. We leave the conclusions to you, dear readers.

“The Eight Dwarfs” – the consequence stalled, forget

For 3 years the dealings stupidly but stubbornly refused provide information on the investigation. He refuses even the Main Cap himself, who receives a question on the subject at each of his tours in parliament – and invariably repeats the stupid refrain: “I can’t do anything and I don’t know anything, send written questions.“. According to our information, subsequent written questions from MPs remain completely unanswered – i.e. on this topic (and on many others) the entire prosecution is in mode: “I love to be crazy”. At the same time, The Court is in place, and already two different panels render judgments which we can only call truthful, meaningful and just. And in this line of thought, this is another illustration of why judicial control over prosecutorial actions (and especially inaction) should be expanded, as we have seen in the last Parliament. Because then, and only then, will there be a way to oblige prosecutors to really work – not to hang, chicane and sweep under the carpet until (say) the statute of limitations expires. Especially for such sizzling investigations, where “They glow like Christmas trees.” prosecutorial stars such as Kanev, Frantisek and Peychinov. Plus, let’s not forget, Sarafov. And the case of Yavor Zlatanov in the ECHR, meanwhile, is already under decision. It’s only a few more months (or maybe even weeks) away. Let’s get ready Let’s pay the Masraf at the deal.Dear readers and taxpayers. Once again!!

***

Разследващата журналистика е разузнаването на гражданите. BIRD се финансира от дарения. Ние не публикуваме реклами. Не получаваме държавни субсидии. Не разчитаме на грантове. Финансирането чрез малки дарения от читатели е гаранция за нашата независимост. Включете се, за да продължим да разкриваме злоупотреби и да държим отговорни властимащите. Използваме Вашите пари за хонорари на журналистите, командировки, изграждане и поддръжка на нашите информационни системи, такси за фирмени и имотни регистри у нас и по света, придобиване на техника и специално оборудване, осигуряване на нашата безопасност и други важни работни мисии. Важно: Ако дарявате всеки месец това ще ни даде възможност да планираме и организираме нашата работа. Благодарим Ви! Нас ни има, защото Вас Ви има!

This post is also available in: Български (Bulgarian)